Introduction: A
tragic flaw is a literary device that represents a character's omission or
defect that leads to the hero's downfall in a tragic literary work. A tragic
flaw is the primary flaw in character or judgment that leads to the tragic
hero's downfall. Such a defect could take the form of a character's bias,
limitation, or imperfection that affects their actions, motives, or abilities
in a hindering or destructive way. Tragic flaws allow writers to create
complex, fully human characters, in addition to providing readers with a deeper
understanding of the impact of those flaws.
Common Examples of Tragedy
Many characters have tragic flaws in Greek and modern tragedies, including Hubris. Here are some common examples of other tragic mistakes a heroic character can make, leading to their downfall:
Ø selfish
Ø lack of judgment
Ø misplaced beliefs
Ø greed lam
Ø lack of confidence
Ø Indecisive
Ø extreme curiosity
Ø misplaced allegiance
Ø angry
Ø defying god, science or nature
Oedipus
Rex is an average classical tragedy as it has the element of tragic putting,
ecosystem and temper, tragic person with tragic hamartia, tragic plot design shifting to tragic disintegration, and
therefore the tragic consciousness by the individual and target audience.
The talk as well as the language of the refrain
additionally emphasizes the tragic message approximately the tragic life of the
ill-fated Oedipus.
Oedipus Rex is an historic Greek tragedy, which is so ordinary of the classical
tragedies that Aristotle took it for example to define and illustrate the
features of a tragedy. Aristotle's definition is a descriptive one (and no
longer prescriptive); the definition of tragedy has been modified due to the
fact many amazing tragedies have been written since without being constrained to the Aristotelian
capabilities. But, it is feasible to first see this tragedy in
terms of Aristotle's definition.
Aristotle described tragedy in phrases of its
plot, man or woman and motion. The plot of a tragedy have to include one,
amazing and entire movement. Every part of the play have to make a contribution
to the very last tragic outcomes and effect. The motive and effect must be
logically connected: no outside force have to intrude. The primary tragic man or woman have to possess
first-rate popularity and best characteristics; but he should even have a weak
spot, even though now not a moral flaw —this weak spot is known as ‘hamartia'. The outcome of the person's personal error of judgment or
of his incorrect motion should carry the fall, from which there may be no
escape. This has to provide us the experience of
inevitability, making us accept and realize the fact and the weak spot of the
person. The reversal and discovery should reveal to the man or woman and the
target market the purpose of the character's undoing and downfall. It ought to
no longer be the doing of the external forces, like supernatural forces or of
fate and danger.
Another tragic detail inside the play Oedipus Rex is
its tragic atmosphere. From beginning to quit, we're uncovered to very serious
and frightening situations. The dramatic war of some of the characters and the dramatic anxiety
that builds in our minds by no means settles down; and there is no comic
detail, even like in Shakespearean tragedies. Like in a normal tragedy, the
dramatist has designed even the talk so carefully as to create and preserve a
completely serious tone and mood for the duration of. The hopes that
continually lead us to worry, and the anxiety that always leads us to frustration, subsequently contributes to the catharsis.
Our fake hopes and wishes as precipitated and guided by means of the refrain
subsequently collapse into the tragic purification of feelings, that's known as
catharsis or purgation (in the target audience), alongside the tragic alternate within the characters.
The chorus is also a corollary element that contributes notably the tragic
traits of this drama.
Modern-day Critics on “Oedipus Rex as Tragedy”:
Modern day critics do no longer accept as true
with Aristotle. They agree that “Oedipus Rex” has a great plot, but Aristotle neglected that concept of
catharsis. Fundamental hassle with “Oedipus Rex” is its hero, who
seems mere a victim of circumstances. They are saying that Oedipus Rex does no longer
go through because of hamartia. It became the need of gods that Oedipus Rex could kill his
father and marry his mother. Oedipus Rex attempted his nice to escape from his
fate, but his efforts have been useless. Whilst the target audience watches the downfall of Oedipus Rex, it does no longer shock the target market.
It best receives the sympathy of the audience that's against the
perception of tragedy.
As a consequence, “Oedipus Rex” does not impact
the catharsis of pity and worry. The downfall of Oedipus Rex appears predestined. His
hubris isn't always responsible for his downfall. Gods are liable for the
autumn of Oedipus Rex. Aristotle himself has said that the man or woman have to
suffer because of “hamartia”, “err”, or “frailty”. In case of “Oedipus Rex”, most
effective gods are answerable for his adverse circumstances; consequently,
there is no concept of catharsis in “Oedipus Rex”.
At the contrary, a few critics, who are fan of Aristotle, says that Oedipus Rex suffers because of
hubris. His rash judgment, his anger and brief decisions are accountable for
his downfall. He definitely has flaw in his character. As a consequence, gods are less but man or
woman is greater responsible for his ruination. He could have stored himself if
he did not kill his father. He has to have now not married a girl who become of
his mom’s age. Be that as it may, the idea of gods is unnoticed. If it's far
the case, then we may additionally name “Oedipus Rex” as a great tragedy.
Conclusion:
To finish, Oedipus Rex is an excellent Greek
tragedy. In present day days, dramatists and novelists have altered the
definition of tragedy however in the one's days, human beings and writers considered
Aristotle’s definition of tragedy as excellent definition. whether Sophocles followed Aristotle or vice versa however, it is authentic that tragedy turned into
described in that era. As referred to in advance, Aristotle did now not deal
with person but the plot of tragedy. If individual is overlooked, even then “Oedipus Rex” is considered as a
tremendous tragedy (a tragedy is viable without man or woman – said Aristotle). Hence, the play “Oedipus Rex” belongs to the style of
“Greek Tragedy”.
0 Comments